Market Research Report

Global Ship Degaussing Device Market Insights, Size, and Forecast By End Use (Naval Defense, Cargo Shipping, Passenger Transportation), By Application (Commercial Vessels, Military Vessels, Research Vessels), By Technology (Active Degaussing System, Passive Degaussing System, Hybrid Degaussing System), By Installation Type (Onboard Installation, Retrofit Installation, Shipyard Installation), By Region (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa), Key Companies, Competitive Analysis, Trends, and Projections for 2026-2035

Report ID:6780
Published Date:Jan 2026
No. of Pages:201
Base Year for Estimate:2025
Format:
Customize Report

Key Market Insights

Global Ship Degaussing Device Market is projected to grow from USD 0.58 Billion in 2025 to USD 0.94 Billion by 2035, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 6.4% from 2026 through 2035. The market for ship degaussing devices encompasses specialized systems designed to reduce a vessel's magnetic signature, thereby enhancing stealth and protecting against magnetic mines or detection by sophisticated sensors. These devices are critical for naval vessels, submarines, and increasingly for commercial ships operating in sensitive areas, ensuring operational security and safety. Key market drivers include the escalating geopolitical tensions worldwide, prompting significant defense budget increases and naval modernization programs. The growing focus on anti-submarine warfare (ASW) capabilities and the imperative for stealth technologies in modern naval operations are also propelling market expansion. Furthermore, the rising adoption of advanced sensor technologies by adversaries necessitates more sophisticated degaussing solutions to maintain a competitive edge. Important trends shaping the market include the shift towards integrated degaussing systems that are more compact, energy-efficient, and capable of real-time magnetic signature management. The development of intelligent degaussing systems leveraging AI and machine learning for automated calibration and optimization is another notable trend.

Global Ship Degaussing Device Market Value (USD Billion) Analysis, 2025-2035

maklogo
6.4%
CAGR from
2025 - 2035
Source:
www.makdatainsights.com

Despite the positive outlook, the market faces several restraints. The high initial cost of implementing and maintaining degaussing systems can be a significant barrier for some navies, particularly those with smaller budgets. Technical complexities associated with integrating these systems into existing vessel designs and the need for specialized expertise for operation and maintenance also pose challenges. Moreover, the long lifecycle of naval vessels can slow down the adoption of newer degaussing technologies, as upgrades are often part of broader modernization cycles. However, significant market opportunities exist in the development of modular and retrofittable degaussing solutions, which could lower costs and accelerate adoption for older fleets. The expansion into commercial shipping, particularly for vessels traversing ecologically sensitive or militarily active zones, presents another untapped opportunity. Increasing collaboration between defense contractors and research institutions to innovate next-generation degaussing technologies, such as advanced superconducting systems, also offers substantial growth avenues.

The Military Vessels segment holds the dominant market share, underscoring the critical role degaussing plays in naval defense and offensive capabilities. Naval forces globally prioritize reducing magnetic signatures to avoid detection and protect against magnetic mines and torpedoes. North America emerges as the dominant region in the global ship degaussing device market. This dominance is attributed to the substantial defense spending by countries in the region, particularly the United States, and the presence of leading defense contractors and a robust shipbuilding industry. The region’s commitment to advanced naval technologies and ongoing modernization efforts further solidify its market leadership. Asia Pacific is identified as the fastest growing region, driven by the rapid expansion and modernization of naval forces in countries like China, India, and South Korea, coupled with increasing maritime disputes and security concerns. Key players in this highly competitive market include General Dynamics, Leonardo, Kongsberg Gruppen, CurtissWright, L3Harris Technologies, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon Technologies, Terma, and Atlas Elektronik. These companies are actively engaged in strategic initiatives such as research and development for advanced degaussing technologies, forging partnerships with naval forces, and expanding their global footprint to capitalize on emerging opportunities.

Quick Stats

  • Market Size (2025):

    USD 0.58 Billion
  • Projected Market Size (2035):

    USD 0.94 Billion
  • Leading Segment:

    Military Vessels (68.4% Share)
  • Dominant Region (2025):

    North America (38.2% Share)
  • CAGR (2026-2035):

    6.4%

What are the Key Drivers Shaping the Global Ship Degaussing Device Market

Increasing Global Maritime Traffic and Naval Expansion

The burgeoning volume of international shipping and the significant growth in naval fleets directly fuels demand for ship degaussing devices. Commercial vessels, transporting an ever-increasing array of goods across oceans, require these systems to reduce their magnetic signature, ensuring navigational safety and avoiding interference with sensitive equipment. Simultaneously, modern naval expansion programs emphasize stealth and protection. Warships, submarines, and specialized vessels incorporate advanced degaussing technology to counter magnetic mines, detect submarines more effectively, and reduce vulnerability to other magnetic threats. This dual pressure from both commercial and military maritime sectors, driven by expanding global trade routes and escalating geopolitical considerations, creates a robust and expanding market for degaussing solutions.

Strict Regulatory Mandates for Magnetic Signature Management

Stringent governmental regulations worldwide compel naval vessels and some commercial ships to actively manage their magnetic signatures. These mandates are primarily driven by national security concerns, requiring military ships to reduce their detectability to magnetic anomaly detectors used by adversaries for submarine and mine detection. Additionally, certain environmental and safety regulations may necessitate signature control to prevent interference with sensitive marine equipment or to protect marine life. Compliance with these strict rules often necessitates the installation and continuous use of advanced ship degaussing systems, thereby significantly fueling demand for degaussing devices across the global maritime industry. This regulatory push ensures consistent market growth.

Technological Advancements in Degaussing System Efficiency

Technological advancements in degaussing system efficiency significantly propel the global ship degaussing device market. Innovations in magnetic field generation and control algorithms allow for more effective neutralization of a ship's magnetic signature, a critical requirement for naval vessels to evade detection by magnetic mines and submarines. Miniaturization of components and improved power management reduce the size and energy consumption of degaussing systems, making them easier to integrate into existing ship designs and lowering operational costs. The development of advanced sensors and real time feedback loops enables dynamic degaussing, adapting to changing magnetic environments for superior stealth capabilities. These continuous enhancements in performance and practicality directly drive adoption by navies worldwide seeking to upgrade their fleets with superior magnetic stealth technology.

Global Ship Degaussing Device Market Restraints

High Initial Investment and Complex Integration Challenges

A significant hurdle in the global ship degaussing device market is the substantial capital outlay required for acquiring and implementing these advanced systems. Naval forces and commercial shipping companies face considerable upfront costs for specialized degaussing equipment, which encompasses complex sensor arrays, powerful electromagnets, and sophisticated control units. Beyond procurement, the integration of these devices presents intricate engineering challenges. Degaussing systems must be meticulously integrated with existing ship structures, power grids, and command systems without compromising vessel integrity or operational efficiency. This demanding integration process often necessitates extensive ship drydocking, specialized labor, and prolonged installation periods, further escalating overall costs and project timelines. The highly technical nature of these installations demands specialized expertise, adding another layer of expense and complexity for potential adopters.

Limited Awareness and Perceived Need Among Ship Owners

Ship owners often lack comprehensive understanding regarding the vital role and benefits of degaussing technology. Many are unaware of the significant magnetic signature ships acquire and its detrimental effects on onboard electronics, navigation systems, and even a vessel's detectability. This limited awareness extends to the regulatory landscape evolving around magnetic hygiene. Consequently, the perceived need for a degaussing device is low. Owners do not prioritize investment in a solution whose problem they do not fully grasp or consider immediate. This perception is further shaped by an absence of clear, compelling evidence demonstrating tangible returns on investment or cost savings directly attributable to degaussing. Without a strong understanding of risks and rewards, owners defer or avoid purchasing these devices, thereby hindering market expansion.

Global Ship Degaussing Device Market Opportunities

Global Naval Fleet Modernization and Expansion Driving Demand for Advanced Degaussing Systems

Global naval fleets are undergoing extensive modernization and expansion, driven by evolving geopolitical landscapes and the imperative for enhanced maritime security. This involves significant investment in upgrading existing warships and constructing a new generation of technologically advanced vessels across all classes. A core requirement for these modern naval platforms is superior stealth capabilities and enhanced survivability in complex operational environments. This strategic shift inherently escalates the demand for sophisticated degaussing systems. These advanced systems are crucial for effectively reducing a ship's magnetic signature, thus providing vital protection against magnetic mines, torpedoes, and other advanced detection technologies. They also safeguard critical onboard electronic equipment. The global drive towards building more resilient, undetectable, and battle ready navies directly creates a sustained, high growth opportunity for manufacturers delivering innovative degaussing solutions to meet these escalating defense needs worldwide.

Emergence of AI-Powered and Compact Degaussing Solutions for Autonomous and Next-Gen Vessels

The emergence of AI powered and compact degaussing solutions presents a significant opportunity within the global ship degaussing device market. As the maritime industry pivots towards autonomous and next generation vessels, conventional degaussing systems encounter new demands concerning space, weight, and operational sophistication. AI driven systems offer intelligent, adaptive magnetic signature management, autonomously optimizing degaussing fields in real time to counteract diverse environmental influences and vessel movements. Their compact design is vital for seamless integration into modern ship architectures where space is at a premium, particularly for unmanned surface vehicles or highly automated platforms. This innovation facilitates more efficient, precise, and less labor intensive degaussing, thereby enhancing stealth capabilities and sensor performance for advanced naval applications. Furthermore, the automation offered by AI aligns perfectly with the operational ethos of autonomous fleets, minimizing human intervention and maximizing system reliability. This trend is especially pertinent in rapidly modernizing maritime regions, fueling demand for sophisticated, integrated degaussing technology.

Global Ship Degaussing Device Market Segmentation Analysis

Key Market Segments

By Technology

  • Active Degaussing System
  • Passive Degaussing System
  • Hybrid Degaussing System

By Application

  • Commercial Vessels
  • Military Vessels
  • Research Vessels

By Installation Type

  • Onboard Installation
  • Retrofit Installation
  • Shipyard Installation

By End Use

  • Naval Defense
  • Cargo Shipping
  • Passenger Transportation

Segment Share By Technology

Share, By Technology, 2025 (%)

  • Active Degaussing System
  • Hybrid Degaussing System
  • Passive Degaussing System
maklogo
$0.58BGlobal Market Size, 2025
Source:
www.makdatainsights.com

Why are Military Vessels dominating the Global Ship Degaussing Device Market?

Military Vessels account for the overwhelming majority of demand due to their critical operational requirements. The imperative for stealth, protection against magnetic mines, and the need to reduce a vessel's magnetic signature for various naval defense strategies drives significant investment in sophisticated degaussing systems. This segment prioritizes advanced, high-performance solutions, often favoring active or hybrid degaussing technologies to ensure maximum effectiveness in challenging maritime environments.

How do degaussing technologies influence market dynamics?

The market is primarily driven by active and hybrid degaussing systems due to their superior performance and adaptability. Active systems offer precise magnetic field cancellation, crucial for military applications where stealth is paramount. Hybrid systems combine the benefits of both active and passive approaches, providing robust protection. While passive systems offer a cost-effective solution, their static nature limits broad adoption, especially in applications requiring dynamic signature management against evolving threats.

What impact do installation types and end use have on market segmentation?

Onboard installation represents a significant portion, particularly for new military vessels integrating degaussing capabilities from conception. Retrofit installation is also vital, allowing existing fleets to upgrade their protective measures without necessitating new ship construction. Shipyard installation often encompasses both, providing comprehensive services during maintenance or new builds. Naval defense, as an end use, is the primary driver across all installation types, underlining the strategic importance of degaussing for national security and maritime operations.

Global Ship Degaussing Device Market Regulatory and Policy Environment Analysis

The global ship degaussing device market is predominantly shaped by stringent defense regulations and naval operational requirements. Key drivers include national security directives prioritizing stealth and survivability for warships and submarines. Military standards such as NATO Standardization Agreements and individual navy specifications (e.g., US Navy MIL STD 1399) mandate precise magnetic signature management to counter magnetic mines and detection systems.

Electromagnetic compatibility EMC directives are crucial, ensuring degaussing systems do not interfere with other critical onboard electronics. Export control regimes, like the International Traffic in Arms Regulations ITAR and the Wassenaar Arrangement, tightly govern the global trade and technology transfer of these sensitive defense technologies, restricting access to nonallied nations. Furthermore, significant government investment in naval modernization programs and research and development initiatives for advanced degaussing techniques directly influences technological evolution and market demand. While commercial shipping has limited direct relevance, some port authorities might have general magnetic field guidelines for specialized vessels.

Which Emerging Technologies Are Driving New Trends in the Market?

The global ship degaussing device market is witnessing transformative innovations. Emerging technologies focus on enhancing system efficiency, adaptability, and stealth capabilities. Advanced material science is driving the development of lighter, more robust degaussing coils and superconducting cables, significantly reducing system footprint and power consumption. Miniaturization allows integration into diverse vessel types, from naval frigates to commercial ships, previously deemed unsuitable due to space constraints.

Intelligent software algorithms and sensor fusion are paramount. These enable dynamic degaussing, where the magnetic signature is continuously monitored and compensated for in real time, adapting to changing geographical magnetic fields and ship movements. Artificial intelligence and machine learning are being deployed for predictive maintenance, optimizing system performance and extending operational lifespans. Furthermore, integration with shipwide combat and navigation systems is creating holistic signature management solutions, crucial for modern naval warfare and maritime security.

Global Ship Degaussing Device Market Regional Analysis

Global Ship Degaussing Device Market

Trends, by Region

Largest Market
Fastest Growing Market
maklogo
38.2%

North America Market
Revenue Share, 2025

Source:
www.makdatainsights.com

Dominant Region

North America · 38.2% share

North America stands as the dominant region in the global ship degaussing device market, commanding a significant 38.2% share. This leadership is primarily driven by substantial defense spending and robust naval modernization programs across the United States and Canada. The region benefits from established industrial bases and a strong focus on advanced maritime technologies, including sophisticated degaussing solutions essential for stealth and operational security. Furthermore, a high concentration of research and development activities in naval defense contributes to continuous innovation and adoption of cutting edge degaussing systems. Strict regulatory frameworks pertaining to maritime safety and national security also bolster demand for compliant and high performance degaussing equipment within North America.

Fastest Growing Region

Asia Pacific · 7.9% CAGR

Asia Pacific stands out as the fastest growing region in the Global Ship Degaussing Device Market with a projected Compound Annual Growth Rate of 7.9% from 2026 to 2035. This substantial growth is primarily fueled by escalating geopolitical tensions and a corresponding increase in naval defense spending across major economies in the region. Countries are rapidly modernizing their fleets demanding sophisticated degaussing solutions for enhanced stealth and survivability of their vessels. Furthermore the expansion of commercial shipping and the rising awareness of electromagnetic signature management contribute significantly to the market’s vigorous expansion within Asia Pacific solidifying its position as a key growth engine.

Impact of Geopolitical and Macroeconomic Factors

Geopolitical tensions, particularly in the South China Sea and Arctic, drive naval modernization programs across major maritime powers. These nations prioritize submarine survivability against magnetic signature detection, fueling demand for advanced degaussing devices. Rising naval expenditures, especially from China, Russia, and India, responding to perceived threats and expanding maritime interests, directly translate into increased procurement of sophisticated ship technologies. International collaboration on anti submarine warfare (ASW) capabilities among NATO allies and partners further stimulates development and adoption of high performance degaussing systems, crucial for stealth operations.

Economically, global economic growth impacts defense budgets, with stronger economies allocating more towards naval fleets. Technological advancements in magnetics and sensor technology, driven by private sector innovation and government funding, lower production costs and improve device efficacy. Supply chain vulnerabilities, exacerbated by geopolitical friction and trade disputes, influence component availability and pricing, potentially impacting market expansion. Inflationary pressures affecting raw material costs for electromagnetic components could also influence pricing strategies and the overall economic viability of next generation degaussing solutions.

Recent Developments

  • March 2025

    General Dynamics announced a strategic initiative to invest heavily in AI-driven automation for their next-generation degaussing systems. This aims to enhance real-time magnetic signature management and reduce operational complexity for naval fleets.

  • June 2025

    Leonardo S.p.A. unveiled a new modular and scalable degaussing device specifically designed for retrofitting smaller naval vessels and coast guard patrols. This product launch targets a previously underserved segment of the market seeking cost-effective magnetic signature reduction solutions.

  • August 2024

    Kongsberg Gruppen and Atlas Elektronik announced a partnership to jointly develop advanced integrated degaussing and acoustic stealth solutions for submarines. This collaboration leverages their combined expertise in maritime defense technology to offer a more comprehensive stealth package.

  • November 2024

    Curtiss-Wright completed the acquisition of a specialized sensor technology firm focused on advanced magnetic anomaly detection. This acquisition is a strategic move to integrate more precise and responsive magnetic field sensing capabilities into their degaussing device offerings, enhancing real-time performance.

Key Players Analysis

General Dynamics, Leonardo, and Kongsberg Gruppen are key players driving the global ship degaussing device market. They leverage advanced magnetic field measurement and compensation technologies for naval vessels. Strategic initiatives include developing next generation stealth capabilities and integrating smart sensor systems. Market growth is fueled by increasing naval modernization programs and the need for enhanced ship survivability and operational effectiveness against modern threats.

List of Key Companies:

  1. General Dynamics
  2. Leonardo
  3. Kongsberg Gruppen
  4. CurtissWright
  5. L3Harris Technologies
  6. Lockheed Martin
  7. Northrop Grumman
  8. Raytheon Technologies
  9. Terma
  10. Atlas Elektronik
  11. BAE Systems
  12. Elbit Systems
  13. Hensoldt
  14. Thales Group
  15. Saab

Report Scope and Segmentation

Report ComponentDescription
Market Size (2025)USD 0.58 Billion
Forecast Value (2035)USD 0.94 Billion
CAGR (2026-2035)6.4%
Base Year2025
Historical Period2020-2025
Forecast Period2026-2035
Segments Covered
  • By Technology:
    • Active Degaussing System
    • Passive Degaussing System
    • Hybrid Degaussing System
  • By Application:
    • Commercial Vessels
    • Military Vessels
    • Research Vessels
  • By Installation Type:
    • Onboard Installation
    • Retrofit Installation
    • Shipyard Installation
  • By End Use:
    • Naval Defense
    • Cargo Shipping
    • Passenger Transportation
Regional Analysis
  • North America
  • • United States
  • • Canada
  • Europe
  • • Germany
  • • France
  • • United Kingdom
  • • Spain
  • • Italy
  • • Russia
  • • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • • China
  • • India
  • • Japan
  • • South Korea
  • • New Zealand
  • • Singapore
  • • Vietnam
  • • Indonesia
  • • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America
  • • Brazil
  • • Mexico
  • • Rest of Latin America
  • Middle East and Africa
  • • South Africa
  • • Saudi Arabia
  • • UAE
  • • Rest of Middle East and Africa

Table of Contents:

1. Introduction
1.1. Objectives of Research
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Market Scope
1.4. Research Methodology
2. Executive Summary
3. Market Dynamics
3.1. Market Drivers
3.2. Market Restraints
3.3. Market Opportunities
3.4. Market Trends
4. Market Factor Analysis
4.1. Porter's Five Forces Model Analysis
4.1.1. Rivalry among Existing Competitors
4.1.2. Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.1.3. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.1.4. Threat of Substitute Products or Services
4.1.5. Threat of New Entrants
4.2. PESTEL Analysis
4.2.1. Political Factors
4.2.2. Economic & Social Factors
4.2.3. Technological Factors
4.2.4. Environmental Factors
4.2.5. Legal Factors
4.3. Supply and Value Chain Assessment
4.4. Regulatory and Policy Environment Review
4.5. Market Investment Attractiveness Index
4.6. Technological Innovation and Advancement Review
4.7. Impact of Geopolitical and Macroeconomic Factors
4.8. Trade Dynamics: Import-Export Assessment (Where Applicable)
5. Global Ship Degaussing Device Market Analysis, Insights 2020 to 2025 and Forecast 2026-2035
5.1. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Technology
5.1.1. Active Degaussing System
5.1.2. Passive Degaussing System
5.1.3. Hybrid Degaussing System
5.2. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Application
5.2.1. Commercial Vessels
5.2.2. Military Vessels
5.2.3. Research Vessels
5.3. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Installation Type
5.3.1. Onboard Installation
5.3.2. Retrofit Installation
5.3.3. Shipyard Installation
5.4. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By End Use
5.4.1. Naval Defense
5.4.2. Cargo Shipping
5.4.3. Passenger Transportation
5.5. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Region
5.5.1. North America
5.5.2. Europe
5.5.3. Asia-Pacific
5.5.4. Latin America
5.5.5. Middle East and Africa
6. North America Ship Degaussing Device Market Analysis, Insights 2020 to 2025 and Forecast 2026-2035
6.1. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Technology
6.1.1. Active Degaussing System
6.1.2. Passive Degaussing System
6.1.3. Hybrid Degaussing System
6.2. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Application
6.2.1. Commercial Vessels
6.2.2. Military Vessels
6.2.3. Research Vessels
6.3. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Installation Type
6.3.1. Onboard Installation
6.3.2. Retrofit Installation
6.3.3. Shipyard Installation
6.4. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By End Use
6.4.1. Naval Defense
6.4.2. Cargo Shipping
6.4.3. Passenger Transportation
6.5. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Country
6.5.1. United States
6.5.2. Canada
7. Europe Ship Degaussing Device Market Analysis, Insights 2020 to 2025 and Forecast 2026-2035
7.1. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Technology
7.1.1. Active Degaussing System
7.1.2. Passive Degaussing System
7.1.3. Hybrid Degaussing System
7.2. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Application
7.2.1. Commercial Vessels
7.2.2. Military Vessels
7.2.3. Research Vessels
7.3. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Installation Type
7.3.1. Onboard Installation
7.3.2. Retrofit Installation
7.3.3. Shipyard Installation
7.4. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By End Use
7.4.1. Naval Defense
7.4.2. Cargo Shipping
7.4.3. Passenger Transportation
7.5. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Country
7.5.1. Germany
7.5.2. France
7.5.3. United Kingdom
7.5.4. Spain
7.5.5. Italy
7.5.6. Russia
7.5.7. Rest of Europe
8. Asia-Pacific Ship Degaussing Device Market Analysis, Insights 2020 to 2025 and Forecast 2026-2035
8.1. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Technology
8.1.1. Active Degaussing System
8.1.2. Passive Degaussing System
8.1.3. Hybrid Degaussing System
8.2. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Application
8.2.1. Commercial Vessels
8.2.2. Military Vessels
8.2.3. Research Vessels
8.3. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Installation Type
8.3.1. Onboard Installation
8.3.2. Retrofit Installation
8.3.3. Shipyard Installation
8.4. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By End Use
8.4.1. Naval Defense
8.4.2. Cargo Shipping
8.4.3. Passenger Transportation
8.5. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Country
8.5.1. China
8.5.2. India
8.5.3. Japan
8.5.4. South Korea
8.5.5. New Zealand
8.5.6. Singapore
8.5.7. Vietnam
8.5.8. Indonesia
8.5.9. Rest of Asia-Pacific
9. Latin America Ship Degaussing Device Market Analysis, Insights 2020 to 2025 and Forecast 2026-2035
9.1. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Technology
9.1.1. Active Degaussing System
9.1.2. Passive Degaussing System
9.1.3. Hybrid Degaussing System
9.2. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Application
9.2.1. Commercial Vessels
9.2.2. Military Vessels
9.2.3. Research Vessels
9.3. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Installation Type
9.3.1. Onboard Installation
9.3.2. Retrofit Installation
9.3.3. Shipyard Installation
9.4. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By End Use
9.4.1. Naval Defense
9.4.2. Cargo Shipping
9.4.3. Passenger Transportation
9.5. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Country
9.5.1. Brazil
9.5.2. Mexico
9.5.3. Rest of Latin America
10. Middle East and Africa Ship Degaussing Device Market Analysis, Insights 2020 to 2025 and Forecast 2026-2035
10.1. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Technology
10.1.1. Active Degaussing System
10.1.2. Passive Degaussing System
10.1.3. Hybrid Degaussing System
10.2. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Application
10.2.1. Commercial Vessels
10.2.2. Military Vessels
10.2.3. Research Vessels
10.3. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Installation Type
10.3.1. Onboard Installation
10.3.2. Retrofit Installation
10.3.3. Shipyard Installation
10.4. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By End Use
10.4.1. Naval Defense
10.4.2. Cargo Shipping
10.4.3. Passenger Transportation
10.5. Market Analysis, Insights and Forecast, 2020-2035, By Country
10.5.1. South Africa
10.5.2. Saudi Arabia
10.5.3. UAE
10.5.4. Rest of Middle East and Africa
11. Competitive Analysis and Company Profiles
11.1. Market Share of Key Players
11.1.1. Global Company Market Share
11.1.2. Regional/Sub-Regional Company Market Share
11.2. Company Profiles
11.2.1. General Dynamics
11.2.1.1. Business Overview
11.2.1.2. Products Offering
11.2.1.3. Financial Insights (Based on Availability)
11.2.1.4. Company Market Share Analysis
11.2.1.5. Recent Developments (Product Launch, Mergers and Acquisition, etc.)
11.2.1.6. Strategy
11.2.1.7. SWOT Analysis
11.2.2. Leonardo
11.2.2.1. Business Overview
11.2.2.2. Products Offering
11.2.2.3. Financial Insights (Based on Availability)
11.2.2.4. Company Market Share Analysis
11.2.2.5. Recent Developments (Product Launch, Mergers and Acquisition, etc.)
11.2.2.6. Strategy
11.2.2.7. SWOT Analysis
11.2.3. Kongsberg Gruppen
11.2.3.1. Business Overview
11.2.3.2. Products Offering
11.2.3.3. Financial Insights (Based on Availability)
11.2.3.4. Company Market Share Analysis
11.2.3.5. Recent Developments (Product Launch, Mergers and Acquisition, etc.)
11.2.3.6. Strategy
11.2.3.7. SWOT Analysis
11.2.4. CurtissWright
11.2.4.1. Business Overview
11.2.4.2. Products Offering
11.2.4.3. Financial Insights (Based on Availability)
11.2.4.4. Company Market Share Analysis
11.2.4.5. Recent Developments (Product Launch, Mergers and Acquisition, etc.)
11.2.4.6. Strategy
11.2.4.7. SWOT Analysis
11.2.5. L3Harris Technologies
11.2.5.1. Business Overview
11.2.5.2. Products Offering
11.2.5.3. Financial Insights (Based on Availability)
11.2.5.4. Company Market Share Analysis
11.2.5.5. Recent Developments (Product Launch, Mergers and Acquisition, etc.)
11.2.5.6. Strategy
11.2.5.7. SWOT Analysis
11.2.6. Lockheed Martin
11.2.6.1. Business Overview
11.2.6.2. Products Offering
11.2.6.3. Financial Insights (Based on Availability)
11.2.6.4. Company Market Share Analysis
11.2.6.5. Recent Developments (Product Launch, Mergers and Acquisition, etc.)
11.2.6.6. Strategy
11.2.6.7. SWOT Analysis
11.2.7. Northrop Grumman
11.2.7.1. Business Overview
11.2.7.2. Products Offering
11.2.7.3. Financial Insights (Based on Availability)
11.2.7.4. Company Market Share Analysis
11.2.7.5. Recent Developments (Product Launch, Mergers and Acquisition, etc.)
11.2.7.6. Strategy
11.2.7.7. SWOT Analysis
11.2.8. Raytheon Technologies
11.2.8.1. Business Overview
11.2.8.2. Products Offering
11.2.8.3. Financial Insights (Based on Availability)
11.2.8.4. Company Market Share Analysis
11.2.8.5. Recent Developments (Product Launch, Mergers and Acquisition, etc.)
11.2.8.6. Strategy
11.2.8.7. SWOT Analysis
11.2.9. Terma
11.2.9.1. Business Overview
11.2.9.2. Products Offering
11.2.9.3. Financial Insights (Based on Availability)
11.2.9.4. Company Market Share Analysis
11.2.9.5. Recent Developments (Product Launch, Mergers and Acquisition, etc.)
11.2.9.6. Strategy
11.2.9.7. SWOT Analysis
11.2.10. Atlas Elektronik
11.2.10.1. Business Overview
11.2.10.2. Products Offering
11.2.10.3. Financial Insights (Based on Availability)
11.2.10.4. Company Market Share Analysis
11.2.10.5. Recent Developments (Product Launch, Mergers and Acquisition, etc.)
11.2.10.6. Strategy
11.2.10.7. SWOT Analysis
11.2.11. BAE Systems
11.2.11.1. Business Overview
11.2.11.2. Products Offering
11.2.11.3. Financial Insights (Based on Availability)
11.2.11.4. Company Market Share Analysis
11.2.11.5. Recent Developments (Product Launch, Mergers and Acquisition, etc.)
11.2.11.6. Strategy
11.2.11.7. SWOT Analysis
11.2.12. Elbit Systems
11.2.12.1. Business Overview
11.2.12.2. Products Offering
11.2.12.3. Financial Insights (Based on Availability)
11.2.12.4. Company Market Share Analysis
11.2.12.5. Recent Developments (Product Launch, Mergers and Acquisition, etc.)
11.2.12.6. Strategy
11.2.12.7. SWOT Analysis
11.2.13. Hensoldt
11.2.13.1. Business Overview
11.2.13.2. Products Offering
11.2.13.3. Financial Insights (Based on Availability)
11.2.13.4. Company Market Share Analysis
11.2.13.5. Recent Developments (Product Launch, Mergers and Acquisition, etc.)
11.2.13.6. Strategy
11.2.13.7. SWOT Analysis
11.2.14. Thales Group
11.2.14.1. Business Overview
11.2.14.2. Products Offering
11.2.14.3. Financial Insights (Based on Availability)
11.2.14.4. Company Market Share Analysis
11.2.14.5. Recent Developments (Product Launch, Mergers and Acquisition, etc.)
11.2.14.6. Strategy
11.2.14.7. SWOT Analysis
11.2.15. Saab
11.2.15.1. Business Overview
11.2.15.2. Products Offering
11.2.15.3. Financial Insights (Based on Availability)
11.2.15.4. Company Market Share Analysis
11.2.15.5. Recent Developments (Product Launch, Mergers and Acquisition, etc.)
11.2.15.6. Strategy
11.2.15.7. SWOT Analysis

List of Figures

List of Tables

Table 1: Global Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Technology, 2020-2035

Table 2: Global Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Application, 2020-2035

Table 3: Global Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Installation Type, 2020-2035

Table 4: Global Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by End Use, 2020-2035

Table 5: Global Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Region, 2020-2035

Table 6: North America Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Technology, 2020-2035

Table 7: North America Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Application, 2020-2035

Table 8: North America Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Installation Type, 2020-2035

Table 9: North America Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by End Use, 2020-2035

Table 10: North America Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Country, 2020-2035

Table 11: Europe Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Technology, 2020-2035

Table 12: Europe Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Application, 2020-2035

Table 13: Europe Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Installation Type, 2020-2035

Table 14: Europe Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by End Use, 2020-2035

Table 15: Europe Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Country/ Sub-region, 2020-2035

Table 16: Asia Pacific Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Technology, 2020-2035

Table 17: Asia Pacific Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Application, 2020-2035

Table 18: Asia Pacific Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Installation Type, 2020-2035

Table 19: Asia Pacific Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by End Use, 2020-2035

Table 20: Asia Pacific Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Country/ Sub-region, 2020-2035

Table 21: Latin America Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Technology, 2020-2035

Table 22: Latin America Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Application, 2020-2035

Table 23: Latin America Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Installation Type, 2020-2035

Table 24: Latin America Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by End Use, 2020-2035

Table 25: Latin America Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Country/ Sub-region, 2020-2035

Table 26: Middle East & Africa Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Technology, 2020-2035

Table 27: Middle East & Africa Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Application, 2020-2035

Table 28: Middle East & Africa Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Installation Type, 2020-2035

Table 29: Middle East & Africa Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by End Use, 2020-2035

Table 30: Middle East & Africa Ship Degaussing Device Market Revenue (USD billion) Forecast, by Country/ Sub-region, 2020-2035

Frequently Asked Questions

;